The Global Hockey Federation (FIH) will create a role pressure to paintings on its international awards variety procedure that led to “anger” and “sadness” this yr however its CEO Thierry Weil has asserted that the winners — they all Indians — should not have been other even with out lovers’ votes.
India swept the FIH annual awards final Wednesday, claiming all best honours in line with a vote casting machine which was once lambasted as a “failure” by way of males’s Olympic champions Belgium, prompting the worldwide frame to mention that it might attempt to determine why some associations didn’t solid their poll.
Many from throughout hockey global wondered whether it is actually a good suggestion to have lovers vote casting for an award which is supposed to outline the most productive athletes and coaches from a technical standpoint.
Then again, the award winners crowned every of the vote casting teams that still concerned the nationwide associations and media.
“Our total technique at FIH is to position athletes and lovers on the centre of the whole lot we do. So, it is very important to present lovers an strategy to categorical their perspectives. If on this regard the present procedure is the appropriate one or no longer, is one thing we can want to analyse after all,” Weil stated in an interview revealed by way of FIH.
Votes from Nationwide Associations — represented by way of their respective captains and coaches — accounted for fifty according to cent of the full outcome, whilst lovers and avid gamers (25 according to cent) in addition to media (25 according to cent) made the opposite part of the votes.
It’s to be famous that handiest 19 associations from the 42-strong Ecu bloc solid their votes, in comparison to 29 out of 33 in Asia.
“…obviously we want to contain the lovers come what may. In spite of everything, due to this vote, we can give you the chance to have interaction with nearly 300,000 lovers. This isn’t handiest just right for India – the place these types of lovers are coming from – however for the expansion of our recreation total and due to this fact the entire hockey neighborhood.
“Additionally, as we have discussed at the day of the vote, all successful athletes have crowned the standings in every of the 3 vote casting teams. In different phrases, even though lovers should not have voted, the successful athletes would had been the similar.”
5 Indian avid gamers and the pinnacle coaches of each the lads’s and ladies’s groups in Tokyo Olympics claimed the highest honours throughout other classes after fetching the utmost votes. The boys’s hockey staff had gained a bronze, its first in 41 years, on the Video games, whilst the ladies’s facet had completed an unparalleled fourth within the showpiece.
Requested if the vote casting procedure will stay the similar one day, Weil mentioned forming a role pressure.
“I will’t solution this query sooner than we do an intensive research. However I will let you know that we can paintings at the long term Stars Awards with the worldwide hockey neighborhood.
“We will be able to interact with many stakeholders to get a hold of a procedure which receives the reinforce of maximum, after which move with it for subsequent yr.
“Those awards are right here to advertise hockey, athletes and coaches. It’s not just right for anyone in the event that they result in controversy. I have already engaged with a couple of and can proceed to take action. We will be able to perhaps create a role pressure to have a look at this.”
He’s “satisfied” that everybody concerned with the sport will succeed in consensus and rejoice those awards one day.
Weil agreed that the absence of avid gamers from the Olympic gold medallists groups had been certain to reason sadness and anger.
“If, in an Olympic yr, the gold medallists do not win any award and any other country will get they all, it’s transparent that this may not come throughout neatly. Subsequently, I after all do perceive the discontentment and in addition, to some degree, the anger, particularly of the groups involved.
“On the identical time, I need to congratulate the winners. They had been all nominated by way of knowledgeable committee – fabricated from FIH, FIH Athletes Committee and top efficiency representatives – and due to this fact had been as a lot entitled because the others to win.
“And each Indian groups had an implausible efficiency on the Olympic Video games Tokyo 2020. I guess that the herbal pleasure which they must rightly really feel by way of successful such an award could have been altered by way of all this, and that’s not great both,” Weil stated.
India’s Harmanpreet Singh gained the lads’s Participant of the Yr award and Gurjit Kaur was once recognised as the most productive participant within the girls’s segment.
Veteran P R Sreejesh and Savita Punia gained the most productive goalkeeper awards within the males’s and ladies’s segment, whilst younger striker Sharmila Devi (girls) and Vivek Sagar Prasad (males) had been adjudged very best emerging stars.
When requested whether or not the present vote casting procedure is correct, Weil stated it comes to the sport’s stakeholders although he didn’t name it the best one. He additionally stated the vote casting procedure was once roughly the similar final yr too.
“There have been two variations. We made it obligatory for the nationwide associations that their votes must come from their nationwide staff coaches and captains; I imagine that everyone will agree that this was once the appropriate factor to do with a purpose to build up the technical legitimacy of the vote.
“Secondly, the vote casting procedure for the coaches was once the similar as the only for the athletes this time (whilst the FIH Trainer of the Yr Award was once decided by way of an FIH panel in the past).”
Weil was once requested why nearly part of the nationwide associations (NAS) didn’t take the chance to vote.
“I’ve individually contacted a number of participants of the hockey neighborhood to warn them about this example, and I do know they had been lively.
“However nonetheless, many nationwide associations didn’t solid their vote. Obviously this had by way of a ways the most important have an effect on at the effects. Should you arrange a jury however part of this jury does not vote, how are you able to be expecting that individuals will unanimously settle for the effects?
“In our research, we can have to ascertain why this example came about.”
This tale has been revealed from a cord company feed with out adjustments to the textual content.