Let’s set the groundwork for this article, shall we?  Here are the very words of our President regarding abortion, from Ben Smith at POLITICO, March 29, 2008, [bold emphasis mine]:

“Look, I got two daughters — 9 years old and 6 years old,” he said. “I am going to teach them first about values and morals, but if they make a mistake, I don’t want them punished with a baby. I don’t want them punished with an STD at age 16, so it doesn’t make sense to not give them information.”

Also please know that it is a fact that, in 1997, then-Senator Barack Obama (D-IL) was all about making sure partial-birth abortions were okay, and in 2001 he also opposed legislation that would protect born-alive failed abortions.  Nice guy, isn’t he?

So it is obvious and apparent and impossible to deny that this President of ours does not endorse abortion, but he seems to revel in its horror, all the while seeking to paint himself as being above the fray and hiding in some sort of twisted elitist intellectualism that normal folks like me just don’t get.  Liberal women may swoon at his being some sort of bastardized ‘champion of death’ who ‘feels their pain’ and supports their femininity, but quite honestly he is nothing more than a death-peddler who gives the appearance of a man who is “pro-choice” so he can score with  loose liberal women.  I mean, let’s be real: a liberal woman who would have a human baby scraped from her womb as a form of birth-control probably doesn’t need a lot of prompting to let some guy use her for a night.  But I digress.

Right now there is a call for some nominees to fill the Supreme Court spot left vacant by Supreme Court Justice Stevens.  Of course, Mr. Obama has been gathering some names for said position, and even Janet Napolitano has been named as a possible choice!  Um, is she a lawyer?  Oh, that’s right- she was Arizona’s AG from 1999 to 2002.  Yeah, she’d make a perfect SC Justice.  Just like she has made for a perfect Homeland Security Guru.  His list thus far is as follows:

Obama’s list of potential nominees includes: Elena Kagan, the U.S. solicitor general; Diane Wood, a U.S. appeals court judge in Chicago; Merrick Garland, a U.S. appeals court judge in Washington, D.C.; Sidney Thomas, a U.S. appeals court judge in San Francisco; and Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano.

A more recent addition to the list is Judge Ann Claire Williams, who serves on the U.S. 7th Circuit Court of Appeals.

The Conservatives have been wondering, and rightly so, if Mr. Obama will make sure his nominees are pro-death, just like he is.  In response to this, Mr. Obama has said:

“I don’t have litmus tests around any of these issues. But I will say that I want somebody who is going to be interpreting our Constitution in a way that takes into account individual rights, including women’s rights. That is something that is going to be very important to me.”

Please note that in liberal-ese, “women’s rights” is always only about abortion.  It’s not about equality.  It’s not about dignity.  It is always, always about making sure a woman can kill an unborn human baby at her convenience and leisure.  (And don’t hand me that whole ‘What if my life is in danger?’ crap.  Name the last time you saw a woman carrying a sign saying to protect the right for a medical procedure that is horrifying and heartbreaking but is needed to save the life of the Mother?  Exactly.)

When asked if he could nominate someone who did not support a woman’s right to choose, Obama said: “I am somebody who believes that women should have the ability to make often very difficult decisions about their own bodies and issues of reproduction.”

He said he would not judge candidates on a single-issue abortion test.

And then a brief historical reference:

In a Democratic primary debate in November 2007, he was asked whether he would insist that a Supreme Court nominee support abortion rights. He said then: “I would not appoint somebody who doesn’t believe in the right to privacy.”

This “right to privacy” is how the SCOTUS in 1973 ruled on Roe v. Wade, a twisted ruling if there ever was one.  Basically they decided that a fetus really wasn’t a human being, so it isn’t really murder to stop its life.  Go figure.  Mr. Obama is chomping at the bit, believe me, to get a liberal onto the SC.  He thinks it might be a battle, but let’s be realistic.  He thinks it will be tough to do.  Seriously, Mr. Obama?

Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy of Vermont stepped up to the plate to defend Mr. Obama and his tough decision to put a liberal onto such a “Conservative Supreme Court”:

“We have right now a very, very activist, conservative activist, Supreme Court,” Leahy said, citing recent decisions. “I think this does not reflect the American people but reflects more of a partisan agenda. I would hope that the president’s nominee can get us back away from that.”

So a “conservative, activist Supreme Court” doesn’t reflect the American people?  Hmm.  According to these stats, America is centrist-right and Conservative, Mr. Leahy.  It is you and your kind that do not represent the people, sir.  (Please don’t make me show you those poll numbers.)

We all know how this is going to play out: Obama will bring forth nominees.  Abortion will be the first topic discussed.  The true Conservatives will hate it.  The liberals will love it.  There will be fights, battles, articles, news stories, etc, and eventually a Supreme Court Justice will be appointed.  And while I stand on the Right side in the pro-Life camp, I fear we will soon be seeing yet another kool-aid drinking liberal who has blood on their hands taking their place amongst the Supreme Court.

You can call me a pessimist.  I prefer to call myself a realist.  I know who runs Bartertown.  And I know all about his agenda.  This is just one more piece to the puzzle that is the fundamental transformation he warned us all about.  We can still lift up in prayer all those women who feel like death is their only solution.

We’ll make it, though.  We always do.  No matter what.  Long Live the unborn Republic!

Extra Credit reading list:

The “Right” to an abortion according to the Constitution

Helium: Debate on abortion

Abortion- let’s have this discussion, then

The unborn, the living, and President Obama