<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obama backs Coakley, but he&#8217;s not sure why</title>
	<atom:link href="http://politicalintegritynow.com/2010/01/obama-backs-coakley-but-hes-not-sure-why/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://politicalintegritynow.com/2010/01/obama-backs-coakley-but-hes-not-sure-why/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 07:39:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Foeplelowd</title>
		<link>http://politicalintegritynow.com/2010/01/obama-backs-coakley-but-hes-not-sure-why/comment-page-1/#comment-8532</link>
		<dc:creator>Foeplelowd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2012 20:11:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalintegritynow.com/?p=4405#comment-8532</guid>
		<description>So far in the Crash Next year Phenomena Month, we have discussed a lot with regards to traits by means of big disposition   coat, big guys, jeweled add-ons, purple velvet and also alc ? ve scalp. A subject, certainly, is the way carry out graphic designers manage to use those vivid options and then interpret them in a product wearable and chic in contrast to kitschy and also trivial? For the purpose of autumn, the remedy appears to be by pointing out Low Models that the ones add-ons appear to be. 
Cleanse, efficient lines are those things may make lots of the year&#039;s other fashion succeed, which means shoppers i am concluding apart as well as seasons roundup by incorporating of the highest requisites your runways offer. All these designs make a good, present day cloth which decoration and also aspect normally requires heart position, nevertheless by themself, the outcome is still quite pleasant.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.burberrysaleoutlets.net/&quot; / rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;burberry&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So far in the Crash Next year Phenomena Month, we have discussed a lot with regards to traits by means of big disposition   coat, big guys, jeweled add-ons, purple velvet and also alc ? ve scalp. A subject, certainly, is the way carry out graphic designers manage to use those vivid options and then interpret them in a product wearable and chic in contrast to kitschy and also trivial? For the purpose of autumn, the remedy appears to be by pointing out Low Models that the ones add-ons appear to be.<br />
Cleanse, efficient lines are those things may make lots of the year&#8217;s other fashion succeed, which means shoppers i am concluding apart as well as seasons roundup by incorporating of the highest requisites your runways offer. All these designs make a good, present day cloth which decoration and also aspect normally requires heart position, nevertheless by themself, the outcome is still quite pleasant.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             <a href="http://www.burberrysaleoutlets.net/" / rel="nofollow">burberry</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: seoer</title>
		<link>http://politicalintegritynow.com/2010/01/obama-backs-coakley-but-hes-not-sure-why/comment-page-1/#comment-8289</link>
		<dc:creator>seoer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2011 22:41:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalintegritynow.com/?p=4405#comment-8289</guid>
		<description>I really like it,Exceptional Post.I&#039;m Figure out to put this into use 1 of these Day times.Thank you for sharing this.To Your Achievement!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really like it,Exceptional Post.I&#8217;m Figure out to put this into use 1 of these Day times.Thank you for sharing this.To Your Achievement!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rachel Strohmeyer</title>
		<link>http://politicalintegritynow.com/2010/01/obama-backs-coakley-but-hes-not-sure-why/comment-page-1/#comment-7339</link>
		<dc:creator>Rachel Strohmeyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Dec 2010 08:09:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalintegritynow.com/?p=4405#comment-7339</guid>
		<description>I cling on to listening to the news update speak about getting free online grant applications so I have been looking around for the finest site to get one. Could you advise me please, where could i find some?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I cling on to listening to the news update speak about getting free online grant applications so I have been looking around for the finest site to get one. Could you advise me please, where could i find some?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donald Borsch Jr.</title>
		<link>http://politicalintegritynow.com/2010/01/obama-backs-coakley-but-hes-not-sure-why/comment-page-1/#comment-1811</link>
		<dc:creator>Donald Borsch Jr.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 02:34:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalintegritynow.com/?p=4405#comment-1811</guid>
		<description>GET REAL:

Actually, you uninformed emotional American-hating liberal sycophant, it was Hillary Clinton who, in 2003, said:

&quot;I am sick and tired of people who say that if you debate and you disagree with this administration somehow you&#039;re not patriotic. We should stand up and say we are Americans and we have a right to debate and disagree with any administration.&quot;

And to your comment that now since Brown is in office, we can look forward to 3 more years of nothing getting done-  um, you just admitted that Obama hasn&#039;t gotten anything done in his first year.  How&#039;s that Hope and Change working out for ya?

Now run along and go watch Gossip Girl episodes you have on your DVR.  The adults are trying to talk here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GET REAL:</p>
<p>Actually, you uninformed emotional American-hating liberal sycophant, it was Hillary Clinton who, in 2003, said:</p>
<p>&#8220;I am sick and tired of people who say that if you debate and you disagree with this administration somehow you&#8217;re not patriotic. We should stand up and say we are Americans and we have a right to debate and disagree with any administration.&#8221;</p>
<p>And to your comment that now since Brown is in office, we can look forward to 3 more years of nothing getting done-  um, you just admitted that Obama hasn&#8217;t gotten anything done in his first year.  How&#8217;s that Hope and Change working out for ya?</p>
<p>Now run along and go watch Gossip Girl episodes you have on your DVR.  The adults are trying to talk here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GET REAL</title>
		<link>http://politicalintegritynow.com/2010/01/obama-backs-coakley-but-hes-not-sure-why/comment-page-1/#comment-1809</link>
		<dc:creator>GET REAL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 19:26:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalintegritynow.com/?p=4405#comment-1809</guid>
		<description>BOYCOTT MASSACHUSETTS
THEY JUST SCREWED AMERICA</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BOYCOTT MASSACHUSETTS<br />
THEY JUST SCREWED AMERICA</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GET REAL</title>
		<link>http://politicalintegritynow.com/2010/01/obama-backs-coakley-but-hes-not-sure-why/comment-page-1/#comment-1808</link>
		<dc:creator>GET REAL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 19:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalintegritynow.com/?p=4405#comment-1808</guid>
		<description>IF YOU DON&#039;T BACK THE PRESIDENT YOU&#039;RE UNAMERICAN.  ISN&#039;T THAT WHAT THE REPLICAN&#039;S SCREAMED WHILE GEORGE BUSH WAS RUINING THE COUNTRY.    I THINK I HEARD FOX NEWS SAY IT NUMEROUS TIMES, LOVE IT OR LEAVE IT.  

NOW THAT BROWN IS IN OFFICE WE CAN LOOK FORWARD TO 3 MORE YEARS OF NOTHING GETTING DONE
WE COULD HAVE LEFT BUSH IN OFFICE</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IF YOU DON&#8217;T BACK THE PRESIDENT YOU&#8217;RE UNAMERICAN.  ISN&#8217;T THAT WHAT THE REPLICAN&#8217;S SCREAMED WHILE GEORGE BUSH WAS RUINING THE COUNTRY.    I THINK I HEARD FOX NEWS SAY IT NUMEROUS TIMES, LOVE IT OR LEAVE IT.  </p>
<p>NOW THAT BROWN IS IN OFFICE WE CAN LOOK FORWARD TO 3 MORE YEARS OF NOTHING GETTING DONE<br />
WE COULD HAVE LEFT BUSH IN OFFICE</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jan Brever</title>
		<link>http://politicalintegritynow.com/2010/01/obama-backs-coakley-but-hes-not-sure-why/comment-page-1/#comment-1789</link>
		<dc:creator>Jan Brever</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 11:24:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalintegritynow.com/?p=4405#comment-1789</guid>
		<description>Way to go Emily!  Don&#039;t hold back now.  I&#039;m with you... cannot stand to hear his lying voice!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Way to go Emily!  Don&#8217;t hold back now.  I&#8217;m with you&#8230; cannot stand to hear his lying voice!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emily Cooper</title>
		<link>http://politicalintegritynow.com/2010/01/obama-backs-coakley-but-hes-not-sure-why/comment-page-1/#comment-1786</link>
		<dc:creator>Emily Cooper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 05:07:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalintegritynow.com/?p=4405#comment-1786</guid>
		<description>LIAR LIAR LIAR! He&#039;s such a F$#&amp;ing LIAR. I&#039;m so sick of being lied to every time I see his face.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LIAR LIAR LIAR! He&#8217;s such a F$#&amp;ing LIAR. I&#8217;m so sick of being lied to every time I see his face.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fabio Escobar</title>
		<link>http://politicalintegritynow.com/2010/01/obama-backs-coakley-but-hes-not-sure-why/comment-page-1/#comment-1785</link>
		<dc:creator>Fabio Escobar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 02:58:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalintegritynow.com/?p=4405#comment-1785</guid>
		<description>The best thing about the President&#039;s comments is that he was more clearly combative. The White House has decided that it is time for the President to come out of the closet and more openly argue for liberalism and progressive policies. The WH political team appears to believe that liberalism is a winner at the polls. 

This is a monumental shift in U.S. politics. Ever since the electoral debacle of 1984 Democrats have shied away from the liberal and progressive ideology. Even when they have believed in these ideals they have made an effort to hide them. Jesse Jackson can be identified as the last serious out-of-the-closet liberal candidate in a Democratic primary. 

The reason for avoiding the labels was a good one: it was assumed that the U.S. electorate was moderate or perhaps slightly right of the center. Whether it&#039;s polling or for other other reasons, that belief no longer holds among Axelrod et al. This means that the nation will finally see a real debate between liberalism and something else. But what will that something else be?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The best thing about the President&#8217;s comments is that he was more clearly combative. The White House has decided that it is time for the President to come out of the closet and more openly argue for liberalism and progressive policies. The WH political team appears to believe that liberalism is a winner at the polls. </p>
<p>This is a monumental shift in U.S. politics. Ever since the electoral debacle of 1984 Democrats have shied away from the liberal and progressive ideology. Even when they have believed in these ideals they have made an effort to hide them. Jesse Jackson can be identified as the last serious out-of-the-closet liberal candidate in a Democratic primary. </p>
<p>The reason for avoiding the labels was a good one: it was assumed that the U.S. electorate was moderate or perhaps slightly right of the center. Whether it&#8217;s polling or for other other reasons, that belief no longer holds among Axelrod et al. This means that the nation will finally see a real debate between liberalism and something else. But what will that something else be?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dinah</title>
		<link>http://politicalintegritynow.com/2010/01/obama-backs-coakley-but-hes-not-sure-why/comment-page-1/#comment-1784</link>
		<dc:creator>Dinah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 01:49:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalintegritynow.com/?p=4405#comment-1784</guid>
		<description>This is the most spineless, snake-like so-called leader we have ever had.  He needs to be impeached. PERIOD!  This guy is ruining our country and we the people need to stand up to him before he finishes the job.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the most spineless, snake-like so-called leader we have ever had.  He needs to be impeached. PERIOD!  This guy is ruining our country and we the people need to stand up to him before he finishes the job.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->
