Posted by 
Obama looking confused, and why not? He doesn't even know the record of the person he is stumping against
Barack Obama, our president, is now campaigning against Scott Brown on behalf of Martha Coakley. He gave a speech Sunday to try to tell the people of Boston that they needed to elect Martha Coakley on January 19th. We try not to be overly critical, but then again, this is Political Integrity Now and we do demand integrity. Obama stood there and lauded Coakley as a great person, wonderful Attorney General and the next Senator of MA. He said, “Just look at her record.” Yet he went on to deride Scott Brown, her opponent, who by the way is a Lt. Colonel in the MA National Guard (where he’s served for 29 years.) Our president, who is supposed to be a man of honor and integrity, said that Martha Coakley had taken on cases that most of us don’t even want to know about, including child abuse cases. Maybe he just didn’t look into her record himself, or maybe he doesn’t think it is an issue, but Martha Coakley (then DA) investigated and then allowed a sexual predator who raped his 23 month old niece with a hot curling iron go free without taking any action against him. Only after the child’s mother filed criminal complaints against him, did Coakley go after an indictment. And even at that point, almost 10 months after the horrendous rape of this baby, Martha Coakley (President Obama’s pick to fill “the People’s seat” in MA) and her office recommended that the monster be released on personal recognizance, WITH NO CASH BAIL. He remained free until more than 2 years after he so violently assaulted this child, on Martha Coakley’s watch, finally being convicted and being sentenced to two life terms.
I know that the above crime is heart-wrenching and stomach churning and it pains me to even type the words, much less think about them. But it is vital to the context of Obama’s most poignant statement to the Boston crowd in support of Coakley that you understand what her track record is. In his usual cocky manner, Obama looked those people in the eye and said (4:35 mark of the video), “[Scott Brown] may be a perfectly nice guy, I DON’T KNOW HIS RECORD…I don’t know whether he’s been fighting for you, up until now.” He went on to claim in jest that it was possible, although unlikely by the tone of his voice, that Brown had been fighting for the people of Massachusetts, laughing off the fact that he really didn’t know. That’s right America, all Obama knows is that we need to elect Martha Coakley. He doesn’t know or care what her record is, and he readily admits that he has absolutely no idea what Scott Brown’s record is, but we should just trust him. In the same breath he says that we need someone who doesn’t just vote along party line. I’m just left wondering, if Obama isn’t actually aware of Coakley’s record, and we know that he isn’t aware of Scott Brown’s, then what exactly is he encouraging MA to vote on? Oh, that’s right, he wants…strike that, he NEEDS a vote right down the party line, something that even he acknowledges lacks integrity. An interesting and relevant point that perhaps Obama might want to take into consideration before his teleprompter urges him to speak again:
Scott Brown received the 2004 “Public Servant of the Year” Award from the United Chamber of Commerce, for his leadership in reforming the state’s sex offender laws and protecting the rights of victims, according to his website, and is one of the State’s most outspoken advocates for victims of sexual abuse.
Hecklers managed to infiltrate the usually carefully pre-screened audience for the speech. At least one man and one child were heard voicing their disagreement with Obama. The man was escorted away by police for chanting and holding up a sign that read, “Jesus loves ALL the children” and it is uncertain whether the child was removed or stopped chanting on his own accord. The loyal Obama groupies behind him were dumbfounded when they heard the commotion, and again, the president simply found it humorous. Amazing!
Natalie Nichols is currently TX District 4 Coordinator for Smart Girl Politics (SGP), a group that empowers Conservative women, and a contributing writer for Smart Girl Nation, SGP’s online magazine. She is Co-Founder of Political Integrity Now, a Conservative online news, analysis, and commentary site. Natalie is creator of the Texarkana TEA Patriots website, a site where local patriots can meet, organize, and take action. Additionally, she is a member of Star of Texas Republican Women, one of the coordinators for the TEA parties in Texarkana, and is a member of the Bowie County Patriots and is running for local office.
Please donate to Natalie’s campaign and support a true conservative running in a county represented by only one Republican in office. “I REFUSE TO COMPROMISE MY VALUES AND BELIEFS!”
Please join Natalie on Facebook and Twitter.
Other Articles of interest:
The uniter: Scott Brown’s center-right-indie coalition
Pollster.com: Brown has significant and growing lead
WH plans to cram Senate ObamaCare bill down House throat if Brown wins
Urgent Appeal RE: Massachusetts and Other States
Snort: Martha Antoinette Coakley calls in John French Kerry
The Next Battle: Stop Socialism
Social comments and analytics for this post…
This post was mentioned on Twitter by PINupdates: Obama backs Coakley, but he’s not sure why http://is.gd/6wLeQ...
I find it amazing that anyone who disagrees with Obama is escorted out of the audience by police. Way to be nonpartisan, Obama! You don’t care about the track record, you only care about your own special interests and what you think her vote will do for you!
The title of the article “Obama backs Coakley, but he’s not sure why,” is inaccurate. He knows EXACTLY why: He needs to keep the senate filibuster proof so he can cram health care down our throats. Transparency, uniting the left and right; just two more in the long list of Obama LIES. 2012 can’t get here fast enough.
AMEN Linda
Exactly Brian…Most of politicians today will back someone based on political clout not by virtue.
once again he cannot make a speech without reading it in front of him—-dah
That’s a great point, Brian, and I agree.
Don’t misjudge obama!! Certainly he knows why he is backing Coakley. He is backing her, no matter what her record IS, because he knows she will back him regardless of what he DOES!!! We will stand a better chance of saving our country if we replace the whole congress and elect people with common sense.
Obama only supports the people that are crooked, it gives him company in the White House. The more crooked, lying, evil people he gets elected, the easier it will be to ruin America and the people.
When trust is what causes your friends to be close, your spouse
to make you both one, we need to trust the leader to be honest,
trust worthy, and for sure not deceptive.
And if you can’t smell deceit where Obama stands, you to
might have his characteristics that you praise.
This is the most spineless, snake-like so-called leader we have ever had. He needs to be impeached. PERIOD! This guy is ruining our country and we the people need to stand up to him before he finishes the job.
The best thing about the President’s comments is that he was more clearly combative. The White House has decided that it is time for the President to come out of the closet and more openly argue for liberalism and progressive policies. The WH political team appears to believe that liberalism is a winner at the polls.
This is a monumental shift in U.S. politics. Ever since the electoral debacle of 1984 Democrats have shied away from the liberal and progressive ideology. Even when they have believed in these ideals they have made an effort to hide them. Jesse Jackson can be identified as the last serious out-of-the-closet liberal candidate in a Democratic primary.
The reason for avoiding the labels was a good one: it was assumed that the U.S. electorate was moderate or perhaps slightly right of the center. Whether it’s polling or for other other reasons, that belief no longer holds among Axelrod et al. This means that the nation will finally see a real debate between liberalism and something else. But what will that something else be?
LIAR LIAR LIAR! He’s such a F$#&ing LIAR. I’m so sick of being lied to every time I see his face.
Way to go Emily! Don’t hold back now. I’m with you… cannot stand to hear his lying voice!
IF YOU DON’T BACK THE PRESIDENT YOU’RE UNAMERICAN. ISN’T THAT WHAT THE REPLICAN’S SCREAMED WHILE GEORGE BUSH WAS RUINING THE COUNTRY. I THINK I HEARD FOX NEWS SAY IT NUMEROUS TIMES, LOVE IT OR LEAVE IT.
NOW THAT BROWN IS IN OFFICE WE CAN LOOK FORWARD TO 3 MORE YEARS OF NOTHING GETTING DONE
WE COULD HAVE LEFT BUSH IN OFFICE
BOYCOTT MASSACHUSETTS
THEY JUST SCREWED AMERICA
GET REAL:
Actually, you uninformed emotional American-hating liberal sycophant, it was Hillary Clinton who, in 2003, said:
“I am sick and tired of people who say that if you debate and you disagree with this administration somehow you’re not patriotic. We should stand up and say we are Americans and we have a right to debate and disagree with any administration.”
And to your comment that now since Brown is in office, we can look forward to 3 more years of nothing getting done- um, you just admitted that Obama hasn’t gotten anything done in his first year. How’s that Hope and Change working out for ya?
Now run along and go watch Gossip Girl episodes you have on your DVR. The adults are trying to talk here.