güzel sözler aşk sözleri chat yap çet yap gay sohbet gay chat sohbet edebiyat video izle komedi filmi izle resim canvas tablo yağlı boya özlü sözler halı yıkama sex hikayeleri

Committee rejects amendment banning abortions in Baucus bill

Natalie Nichols Posted by on Sep 30th, 2009 and filed under Abortion, Front Page Politics, Heath Care. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can leave a response or trackback to this entry

Reposted from THE HILL, By Jeffrey Young

hatchThe Senate Finance Committee rejected an amendment to its healthcare bill Wednesday that would have required women to purchase a separate, supplemental insurance plan to cover abortion services.

Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-Utah) proposed the amendment with the goal of making existing laws against federal money being used to pay for abortions, and the language in the healthcare bill, ironclad.

“All I’m asking — my gosh — is for specific language in the bill that prohibits federal dollars from being used to fund abortions,” Hatch said.

Sen. Debbie Stabenow (D-Mich.) described Hatch’s amendment as “insulting” to women.

Democrats on the committee, along with pro-abortion-rights Republican Sen. Olympia Snowe (Maine) rejected Hatch’s argument, saying it would be unfair to require women to purchase separate insurance coverage for abortion services. Such a requirement, Snowe said, would raise privacy issues by asking women to anticipate their need for abortion coverage.

“It’s discriminating against women,” said committee Chairman Max Baucus (D-Mont.), who authored the bill.

The amendment failed on a 10-13 vote, with Snowe joining Democrats and Sen. Kent Conrad (D-N.D.) voting with the Republicans.

The bill, authored hews to existing laws on federal funding for abortion, Baucus argued. “The mark makes it clear that no federal funds will be used for abortion. None. None. It’s very clear,” he said. The existing rules, known as the Hyde amendment, includes exceptions for abortions from pregnancies resulting from rape or incest or when the life of the woman is endangered.

Under the legislation, the federal tax credits used by individuals could not be used for abortion services. Instead, the policyholder’s share of the premiums would be “segregated” from the federal dollars and go toward paying for abortion coverage.

That distinction is inadequate because money is inherently fungible, Hatch argued, and the bill needs a clearer prohibition to ensure no federal money goes to pay for an abortion. “You can’t establish complete segregation of the funds.”

Related Story:

Senate Committee Rejects Stronger Anti-Abortion Language in Health Care Bill

1 Response for “Committee rejects amendment banning abortions in Baucus bill”

  1. Congress can spend all my money. They can spend all my children’s money and my grandchildren’s money. They can tax me until I am in the poor-house.

    But I really wish they would stop with this gleeful support of the pro-death movement in the senseless and inhumane slaughter of unborn children.

    Let their blood be upon the hands and heads of these monsters.

Leave a Reply

Photo Gallery

atlantic drugs